Finger snapping cancels out child molesting
How about a great big WTF for yesterday’s Michael Jackson verdict?
What were these jurors thinking, returning a “not guilty” verdict on all 10 counts? They’ve even openly admitted they think he’s molested children. They got caught up in the defense’s successful misdirection, focusing their attention on Janet Arvizo, the mother of the victim. And apparently, the mother was stupid enough to snap her fingers at the jury during her testimony, and that pissed some of them off. Especially Juror #5, Eleanor Cook, a 79-year old grandmother, for whom that performance was the moment the trial changed. “We had our suspicions, but that wasn’t what we were there to do.” Hrmm. I guess this jury was instructed to NOT use their judgement and good sense.
This is the same juror who has already talked about appearing on Oprah and 60 Minutes, and there are rumors of a book deal to reveal all about the secret jury deliberations.
Nice.
So, we’re left to surmise that if the accuser’s mother is a grifter with a history of extorting money from celebrities using her son as a pawn, then that makes it ok for a pedophile to diddle the little boy in his bed. Child molestation is ok with this judge and jury, just as long as it’s with the children of people who don’t have enough sense to keep their kids away from a monster.
And here was a “no shit, sherlock” article. Looks like Michael Jackson will have to keep a lid on his cans of “Jesus Juice” and putting his hands down little boys’ pants. At least until the press stops looking. No more sharing a bed with young boys. Now he’ll just cop a feel on the sofa.
Nice one, jurors. Thanks for letting another high-profile felon walk free on a technicality.
12th gen. American, Constitutionalist, Harley-riding Texan, gun owner & NRA member, blogger, illustrator, Florida Gator alumnus. #TCOT

